This blog describes the possible agenTel configurations that can be set up in
case we deal with a multisite architecture. For each configuration, we’ll
discuss the advantages and disadvantages. We’ll also specify the requirements
in order to setup the configuration.
What?
In a
multisite configuration, the different sites have their own group of agents. There
are different options for a contact center configuration :
·
Sites are
working completely independently. All inbound contact center calls are handled
in the site where the calls arrive
·
Inbound
contact center calls are handled in the site where they arrive but, in case of
an call overflow in one site, calls can also be handled by agents of other
sites
·
All
inbound contact center calls are arriving in one site and all sites can handle
the calls
Multisite configurations
On each site one agenTel
Architecture
Description
In this
configuration, every site has its own complete agenTel installation handling
the calls arriving in this site. Calls will be transferred to local agents.
Possible extensions:
·
Incoming
call overflow can be forwarded to other sites (by PBX)
·
If all
agents are busy, inbound calls can still be transferred to agents of other
sites
Requirements
·
3 PBX’s
·
3 agenTel
installations
·
3
connections with PSTN
·
In case
you want to have overloads transferred towards agents of another sites, then
PBX’s must be interconnected (VoIP infrastructure) and all agenTel CC
installations must have the possibility to monitor agent extensions of other
sites
Advantages
·
No network
load for VoIP calls (except for overflow calls)
·
Every site
can run independently
·
Possibility
to forward overflow calls to other sites
Disadvantages
·
Every site
needs its own connection with the PSTN and needs its own inbound telephone
number
·
Multiple
agenTel servers must be managed (e.g. skill management)
·
No
consolidated statistics can be generated (different databases)
·
Every site
needs its own PBX installation
·
More ports
per site are needed to handle site peaks (higher cost)
One agenTel with multiple IVRs
Architecture
Description
In this
configuration, there is only one agenTel (contact center service) for all the
different sites. The other sites have only a IVR installed.
Requirement
·
3 PBX’s
·
1 full
agenTel installations (IVR + CC)
·
2 IVRs
·
3
connections with PSTN
·
The
agenTel installation in the main site must have the possibility to monitor
agent extensions on all sites
Advantages
·
No network
load for VoIP calls (except for overflow calls)
·
Consolidated
statistics (only on database)
·
Calls can
easily be routed to other sites because extensions are monitored from one
single point
·
agenTel
management is easier because of the centralized agenTel installation (one
contact center service and one database).
Disadvantages
·
Every site
needs its own connection with the PSTN and needs its own inbound telephone
number
·
Multiple
IVR installations have to be managed
·
More ports
per site are needed to handle site peaks (higher cost)
·
In case of
network problems between the different sites, only the main site can continue
working. On the other site, the IVR can still accept the calls but will not be
able to transfer the calls (no routing possible because no connection with the
main site)
One agenTel serving multiple sites
Architecture
Description
Only one
agenTel will serve the other sites. All calls are routed over the VoIP network
towards the agents.
Requirements
·
3 PBX’s
·
1 full agenTel
installations
·
1
connection with PSTN
·
PBX’s must
be interconnected so that the calls can be routed from the IVR in the main site
to agents in the other sites.
·
agenTel on
the main site must be able to monitor the agent extensions of all sites.
Advantages
·
Only one
agenTel installation to manage
·
Consolidated
statistics
·
One can
choose to route inbound calls to the master PBX (one inbound telephone number)
or to the PBX’s in the different sites
·
Inbound
ports are used in a dynamic way. Site peaks can be handled with fewer ports per
site
·
Only one
connection with the PSTN needed in case all inbound calls arrive on the master
site
·
Lower cost
because only one full agenTel installation is needed
Disadvantages
·
Network
load. All transferred calls are routed over the VoIP network
·
In case of
network problems between the different sites, only the main site can continue
working. On the other site, the IVR can still accept the calls but will not be
able to transfer the calls (no routing possible because no connection with the
main site).
One agenTel and PBX serving multiple sites
Architecture
Description
This
configuration has only one agenTel and PBX on the main site. All calls are
routed over the VoIP network towards the agent’s phones.
Requirements
·
1 PBX’s /
2 routers
·
1 full agenTel
installations
·
1
connection with PSTN
Advantages
·
Only one agenTel
installation to manage
·
Consolidated
statistics
·
Only one
PBX is needed
·
Only one
connection with the PSTN
·
Lower cost
because only one PBX and only one agenTel installation is needed
Disadvantages
·
Network
load. All transferred calls are routed over the VoIP network
·
In case of
network problems between the different sites, only one site can continue
working.
I definitely think that this should be well thought out and done in a smart way, it is important to get out there and market your business.
ReplyDeleteThis is a great information and examples, thanks for sharing!
24x7direct inbound contact centre